Les Paul Necks... I think I'm getting old...

Whitestrat

New member
You guys know how it is... When you first start off, you want the thinnest necks ever so you can fly up and down the fretboard easily...

I began with an Ibanez 440R. not this thinnest of necks, but not the thickest either. I then progressed nicely to Fenders and the like, with the 60s C necks to be my favourite. The 50s V necks were always an ok compromise, but the thickness of my neck preferences always hovered around 20 to 21mm at the first fret.

I had a few Epis and Edwards here and there, but never really liked the thicker necks. They always felt cumbersome to me.

Then came my EBMM fetish. 41.3mm nut widths (which I still like), and 21.5mm necks at the first fret. Many of my EBMMs were Silhouettes, which featured the same dimensions in all their necks. The exception, was the Petrucci, which was paper thin at 20mm at the first fret.

Then I began playing Les Pauls, and the Slash GT was my first Gibson. it was a C shaped neck, and was really comfortable. Never measured it, but I know it's close to the EBMMs if not just a tad thicker. But the C shaped profile was still my fav.

I stumbled across a beautiful standard after, and while I was worried about the 50s neck profile, I wasn't about to let that stop me from owning one of the nicest lightbursts I had ever seen, played and heard. But oddly, something happened. I grew very quickly to learn to love the 50s neck. So much so, my Slash felt wrong after that, and I sold it.

The 50s neck was just nice for me, and I still play the same way I did on my Petrucci. Same speed, yet probably more stamina, as my hands don't tire out as quickly.

Lastly, comes my R7BB. Baseball sized neck. And guess what? I LOVE it! I wish the frets were a wee bit taller (it IS known as the fretless wonder, after all) but the neck girth was perfect for me now. it doesn't slow me down either. I still like my EBMM Silhouette necks, but my hands do get a bit tired on those too.

I like the R7 neck so much now, and the 50s neck, believe it or not, feels "thin" to me...
laugh2.gif


Note: I don't have large hands. But they feel very comfortable wrapped round the R7.

I think I'm getting old.
hmm.gif


(I say that, after 21 years of fun filled playing... Just thought I'd add...)
 
Funny, I've always preferred the "so-called" baseball bat necks to the razor-thin Ibanez-ish ones. I don't know about speed, but it just seems way more comfortable to me. I like how it fits snugly in my hand.
 
I like thicker necks because they feel sturdy. It doesn't feel right when there isn't anything to grip
 
i love fat necks, but i need upper fret access...

I was a LOT more comfortable playing upper frets with the Les Pauls with thicker necks than the slim necked ones. I know that sounds odd, but I have no problems playing upper registers on my R7BB or my Chambered Standard, but I had problems on my Slash...
 
Haha :) Once you go FAT, you don't go back :D

I've heard this story so many times :) Most of us favor thin necks when we started out but grow to appreciate fatter necks. These days, if the neck don't start out at at least.880" at the 1st fret, I won't even bother trying the guitar :)

The neck on my personal NosNuma guitar starts at .910" at the 1st fret and .990" at the 12th fret and I'm already wishing the neck's a tad thicker :D ;)
 
The neck on my personal NosNuma guitar starts at .910" at the 1st fret and .990" at the 12th fret and I'm already wishing the neck's a tad thicker :D ;)

Honestly Malcolm, remembering that Nosnuma I tried, I think I'll probably like the neck a lot now!:D
 
I like fat necks, too. I just feel more comfortable, even though I'm a small guy. Smaller than most, anyway. I just feel like I can... dig in... more and not worry about breaking the neck. There's more meat in there.

I'm not a lead player so thin, fast necks and upper-fret accessibility's not a concern for me. Of course, lagi best, good upper-fret accessibility but comparably fat neck. There are times that I do like to shred. :)
 
Last edited:
Back
Top